The Solution at a Glance
Prompt engineering is the craft of giving AI enough context to produce useful output. The formula is embarrassingly simple: specificity plus context equals quality. Vague inputs produce vague outputs. Detailed inputs, shaped by a clear framework, produce content you can actually publish.
- The Framework Learn CRISP: Context, Role, Intent, Specifics, Parameters. Five elements that transform throwaway prompts into publishing machines.
- The Examples Side-by-side comparisons of prompts that fail and prompts that succeed, with explanations you can pattern-match to your own work.
- The Iteration Why the first output is never the final output, and the conversational techniques that turn rough drafts into polished content.
These same prompting principles apply beyond text. If you are working with AI image generators, our guide to AI image prompts shows how specificity and iteration transform visual output too.
Why Most Content Creators Get AI Wrong
The complaints are always the same. "It sounds robotic." "It misses my voice." "I spend more time editing than I would have spent writing." And my personal favorite: "AI just does not understand what I want."
Here is the thing nobody told you: the AI is not broken. Your prompts are. And that is actually good news, because prompts are something you can fix.
The fundamental error is treating AI like a search engine. You type in a few keywords, hit enter, and expect it to read your mind. Google spent twenty years training you to be lazy with input. AI requires the opposite. Garbage in, garbage out is not a cliche here. It is the operating principle.
The Vague Request
"Write me a blog post about marketing." You might as well ask for a piece of writing about a topic. The AI has nothing to work with except the broadest possible category.
The Missing Voice
You expect the AI to capture your tone when you have never described your tone. It cannot read your previous work. It cannot sense your vibe. It only knows what you tell it.
The One-Shot Mindset
Expecting perfection from the first output is like expecting your first draft to win a Pulitzer. AI is a collaborator, not a vending machine. The real work happens in the conversation.
The good news is that prompt engineering is a learnable skill. It is not talent. It is not some mystical connection with the machine. It is craft, and craft can be taught. By the end of this guide, your prompts will produce content that sounds less like a corporate press release and more like something a human would actually want to read.
The Prompt Engineering Framework for Writers: CRISP
Frameworks exist because human memory is unreliable. You need something you can recall without bookmarking, something that becomes automatic with practice. CRISP is that framework. Five letters, five components, zero excuses for vague prompts.
C Context
The background information that shapes everything else.
Example: "I run a B2B SaaS company selling project management tools to small marketing agencies. Our blog targets agency owners who are overwhelmed by client work and looking for efficiency gains."
Why it matters: Without context, the AI writes for a generic audience. With context, it writes for your specific reader with their specific problems.
R Role
The persona the AI should adopt while writing.
Example: "Write as an experienced content marketer who has worked with dozens of agencies. You are practical, slightly irreverent, and allergic to buzzwords. You prefer concrete examples over abstract theory."
Why it matters: Role assignment dramatically affects tone, vocabulary, and perspective. A professor writes differently than a practitioner. A consultant writes differently than a friend.
I Intent
What you want the content to accomplish.
Example: "The goal is to convince readers that their current client onboarding process is costing them money, and position our templated workflow approach as the obvious solution. By the end, they should want to download our onboarding checklist."
Why it matters: Content without intent is just words. Every piece should drive toward something, whether that is awareness, consideration, or conversion.
S Specifics
The concrete details that make content useful.
Example: "Include a section on the three most common onboarding mistakes. Reference the statistic that agencies spend an average of 12 hours per client on onboarding. Mention that Asana, Monday.com, and Notion are the tools our readers typically use."
Why it matters: Specifics separate expert content from filler. They are the details that make readers trust you actually know what you are talking about.
P Parameters
The constraints that shape the output format.
Example: "Write approximately 1,200 words. Use subheadings every 200-300 words. Include one bulleted list. End with a single clear call-to-action. Avoid the phrases more than ever, game-changer, and unlock."
Why it matters: Parameters prevent runaway outputs and ensure the content fits your publishing requirements. They also let you ban the AI cliches that make content feel machine-generated.
You do not need to include every CRISP element in every prompt. But when your output disappoints, review which elements you skipped. Nine times out of ten, the missing component is the culprit.
Good vs. Bad Prompts: Side-by-Side Examples
Theory is nice. Examples are better. Here are four content types with their before-and-after prompts. Study the patterns, not just the specifics.
Example 1: Blog Post Introduction
Write an introduction for a blog post about email marketing.
Write a 150-word introduction for a blog post titled "Your Welcome Sequence Is Probably Losing You Money." The audience is e-commerce store owners who have an email list but no automated sequences. The tone should be direct and slightly provocative, like a smart friend giving you hard truths. Start with a specific scenario that will make readers recognize themselves, not with a generic statement about email marketing. End with a preview of what the post will cover.
Example 2: Social Media Caption
Write a LinkedIn post about productivity.
Write a LinkedIn post about a counterintuitive productivity insight: that working fewer hours often produces better results than grinding. The hook should be a personal observation or admission, not a statistic. Keep it under 200 words. Use short paragraphs (1-2 sentences each) for scanability. The voice is thoughtful and slightly contrarian, like someone who has been in the grind and come out the other side. End with a question that invites discussion, not a generic CTA. Do not use bullet points or emojis.
Example 3: Email Newsletter
Write me an email newsletter about our new feature.
Write a newsletter email announcing our new AI scheduling feature for our calendar app. Subscribers are busy professionals who signed up because they struggle with time management. The email should: 1) Open with a relatable pain point about scheduling back-and-forth, 2) Introduce the feature as the solution in 2-3 sentences, 3) Include one specific example of how it works, 4) End with a single CTA to try the feature, not multiple links. Tone: helpful and excited, but not salesy. Length: under 250 words. Subject line should create curiosity without being clickbait.
Example 4: Research Summary
Summarize this article about content marketing trends.
Summarize this article for a content manager who needs to brief their team in a 5-minute standup. Focus on: 1) The 2-3 most actionable insights, 2) Any statistics that would be useful in stakeholder presentations, 3) Implications for our content strategy. Ignore predictions about 2025 and beyond, we only care about what we can implement this quarter. Format as bullet points with one sentence per point. Total length: under 150 words.
Notice the pattern. Good prompts are not longer for the sake of being longer. They are longer because they answer the questions the AI would otherwise have to guess about. Who is the audience? What is the purpose? What should be included? What should be excluded? How should it be structured? What tone should it use?
Conversational Techniques for Publish-Ready Content
Here is where beginners and advanced users diverge. Beginners treat prompts as commands. Type once, accept output. Advanced users treat prompts as the beginning of a conversation. The first draft is raw material, not finished product.
This mindset shift is crucial. If you expect perfection from output one, you will always be disappointed. If you expect a solid starting point that you will refine through dialogue, you will consistently produce better work in less time than writing from scratch.
The Power of Follow-Up Prompts
Your follow-up prompts are where the real leverage is. Here are the ones I use most often, with explanations of when to deploy them.
Example Conversation: From Rough to Ready
Here is what a productive AI conversation looks like. Notice how each prompt builds on the previous output.
Context Carries Forward
Within a conversation, the AI remembers what came before. You can reference "paragraph two" or "the opening" without re-explaining. This is why iterative refinement works. Build on context instead of starting over.
Three turns. Maybe two minutes total. The final output is something I could publish with minimal editing. Not because the AI is magic, but because I directed it through the revisions that any good editor would make.
Templates You Can Use Today
Enough theory. Here are copy-paste templates for the most common content creator tasks. Replace the bracketed placeholders with your specifics. Adapt the tone descriptors to match your voice. These work with ChatGPT, Claude, or any other capable language model.
Blog Post Template
Write a [WORD COUNT]-word blog post about [TOPIC]. Context: I run [YOUR BUSINESS/SITE]. My audience is [AUDIENCE DESCRIPTION]. They typically struggle with [PAIN POINTS]. Role: Write as [VOICE DESCRIPTION, e.g., "a practical consultant who values clarity over cleverness"]. Structure: - Hook that addresses [SPECIFIC READER SITUATION] - Problem section explaining why [CURRENT APPROACH] fails - Solution section introducing [YOUR APPROACH/FRAMEWORK] - 2-3 specific examples or tactics - Conclusion with one clear next step Constraints: - Use subheadings every 200-300 words - Include one bulleted list - Avoid: [CLICHES TO BAN] - Tone: [TONE DESCRIPTION]
Customization tip: The "Avoid" constraint is where you ban AI-isms. Add phrases you have seen too many times: "game-changer," "leverage," "in today's world," etc.
Social Media Post Template
Write a [PLATFORM] post about [TOPIC/INSIGHT]. Context: My followers are [AUDIENCE]. I typically post about [YOUR CONTENT PILLARS]. Hook: Start with [HOOK TYPE: personal story / surprising stat / bold claim / question]. Structure: [PLATFORM-SPECIFIC, e.g., "Short paragraphs, 1-2 sentences each" for LinkedIn or "Snappy one-liner format" for Twitter/X] Voice: [TONE, e.g., "Thoughtful but not preachy. Like thinking out loud."] End with: [ENDING TYPE: question for engagement / clear takeaway / soft CTA] Constraints: - Under [WORD/CHARACTER COUNT] - No [PLATFORM-SPECIFIC NO-NOS, e.g., "no emojis" or "no hashtags in body text"]
Customization tip: Different platforms have different norms. LinkedIn favors thought leadership formats. Twitter/X rewards punchy observations. Adjust the structure constraints accordingly.
Email Newsletter Template
Write an email for my newsletter about [TOPIC/ANNOUNCEMENT]. Context: My subscribers are [AUDIENCE]. They signed up because [REASON/PROMISE]. This email should [GOAL: inform / drive action / share insight]. Structure: 1. Opening hook: [HOOK TYPE, e.g., "personal anecdote" or "relatable problem"] 2. Main content: [WHAT TO COVER] 3. One clear CTA: [DESIRED ACTION] Voice: [TONE, e.g., "Friendly and direct, like an email from a smart colleague"] Constraints: - Under [WORD COUNT] - Subject line should: [SUBJECT LINE GUIDANCE, e.g., "create curiosity without clickbait"] - One link only, placed at the CTA - No: [THINGS TO AVOID, e.g., "salesy urgency" or "multiple offers"]
Customization tip: Ask for the subject line explicitly. Without guidance, you will get generic subjects that tank your open rates.
Content Outline Template
Create an outline for a [CONTENT TYPE] about [TOPIC]. Context: This is for [AUDIENCE]. The goal is [INTENT: educate / convince / entertain]. The angle is [YOUR UNIQUE TAKE]. I want the outline to include: - A hook section with [HOOK APPROACH] - [NUMBER] main sections covering [KEY POINTS TO HIT] - Specific examples or data points to include in each section - A conclusion that [CONCLUSION GOAL] Format: Use hierarchical structure (H2 > H3 > bullet points). For each section, include a one-sentence summary of what it should accomplish. Total length when written: approximately [TARGET WORD COUNT]
Customization tip: Outlines are often more valuable than full drafts. A good outline lets you quickly assess structure before investing time in prose.
Editing/Revision Template
I'm going to paste a draft. Please revise it according to these criteria: Goals: - [GOAL 1, e.g., "Tighten the prose, cutting filler words"] - [GOAL 2, e.g., "Make the opening more compelling"] - [GOAL 3, e.g., "Add more specific examples"] Preserve: - [WHAT TO KEEP, e.g., "The overall structure and key points"] - [WHAT TO KEEP, e.g., "The conversational tone"] Change: - [WHAT TO FIX, e.g., "Remove passive voice where possible"] - [WHAT TO FIX, e.g., "Cut jargon and replace with plain language"] Output: Provide the revised version, then list the key changes you made. [PASTE YOUR DRAFT HERE]
Customization tip: Asking for a list of changes forces the AI to be intentional about revisions rather than making random adjustments.
These templates are starting points, not scripts. The more you use them, the more you will develop your own variations optimized for your voice and workflow.
Iterating and Refining: The Feedback Loop
Your first attempt rarely produces your best result. This is not failure. This is how the process works. The writers who get the most value from AI are the ones who have internalized this truth and built iteration into their workflow.
The Iteration Cycle
Start with a CRISP-informed prompt. Be as specific as you can upfront, but do not agonize over perfection.
Read the output critically. What works? What falls flat? What is missing? Do not edit yet. Just diagnose.
Give specific feedback. "Make it more conversational" is okay. "Make paragraph two more conversational by using contractions and shorter sentences" is better.
Continue until the output is 80-90% of the way there. Then do your final polish manually. You are faster at small edits than the AI is at understanding them.
Building Your Prompt Library
After a few weeks of serious AI usage, you will notice patterns. Certain prompt structures consistently produce good output. Certain follow-ups reliably fix common problems. Capture these.
Keep a simple document or note with your best-performing prompts. Organize by content type. Update when you find improvements. This is your competitive advantage: a personalized prompt library tuned to your voice, your audience, and your workflow.
When to Start Over vs. When to Refine
If the output is directionally correct but needs polish, refine within the conversation. If the output fundamentally misses the point or took a completely wrong angle, start a new conversation with a revised initial prompt. Trying to course-correct a badly-aimed output wastes more time than starting fresh with better direction.
A Real Example: Three Iterations to Publish
Here is an abbreviated version of how I recently refined a piece about email subject lines.
Output was too generic. Read like every other email marketing article. Diagnosis: I had not specified a unique angle.
Fix: "Reframe this around the counterintuitive insight that shorter subject lines often underperform. Challenge the conventional wisdom."
Better angle, but examples were hypothetical. Needed concrete evidence. Diagnosis: I had not asked for specifics.
Fix: "Add specific examples. Reference Campaign Monitor data on subject line length. Include 2-3 before/after subject lines with open rate improvements."
Solid content, but conclusion was weak. Diagnosis: Ending trailed off instead of landing.
Fix: "Rewrite the conclusion. End with a specific action readers can take with their next email, not a vague encouragement to experiment."
Final output: Ready to publish with about five minutes of manual polish. Total AI time: maybe ten minutes across three iterations. Comparable quality to what would have taken me an hour to write from scratch.
Three iterations is typical for substantial content. Some pieces need more, some less. The point is that iteration is the normal path, not a sign that something went wrong.
This iterative mindset connects to a deeper truth about AI-assisted writing: your first draft is not precious. When you accept that the first output is raw material to be refined, iteration becomes natural rather than frustrating.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Even with good technique, you will hit walls. Here are the six mistakes I see most often, with their fixes. Consider this your troubleshooting guide.
Being Too Vague
The symptom: Output is generic and could have been written for any audience about any aspect of the topic.
The fix: Add context and constraints. Who is the reader, specifically? What angle makes this piece different from the thousand other articles on the topic? What should be excluded?
Being Too Prescriptive
The symptom: Output feels mechanical, like the AI is just filling in a template instead of creating.
The fix: Leave room for the AI to contribute. Over-specifying every sentence kills creativity. Give direction on what you want to accomplish, not a fill-in-the-blank script.
Ignoring Tone and Voice
The symptom: Content sounds nothing like your brand. It reads like a corporate memo or a textbook.
The fix: Always specify style. Use comparisons: "Write like a witty friend, not a professor." "Conversational but not sloppy." "Direct but not aggressive."
Not Providing Examples
The symptom: The AI cannot quite capture what you want, even after several refinement attempts.
The fix: Show, do not tell. Paste a paragraph of your previous writing and say "match this voice." Give an example of an opening you liked from elsewhere. Concrete examples beat abstract descriptions.
Accepting First Output
The symptom: You are spending hours editing AI output manually because you treat the first draft as semi-final.
The fix: Iterate before editing. It is faster to ask the AI to fix problems than to fix them yourself. Save manual editing for the final 10-20% of polish.
Forgetting Your Audience
The symptom: Content is technically correct but does not resonate. It answers the wrong questions or uses the wrong framing.
The fix: Always state who the content is for. Include their level of expertise, their pain points, what they are trying to accomplish. The AI cannot write for your reader if you do not describe your reader.
When output disappoints, run through this list. Nine times out of ten, the problem traces back to one of these six pitfalls. Fix the input, fix the output.
Still worried about AI content quality? Read our analysis of the Helpful Content Update to understand exactly what Google rewards and how to ensure your AI-assisted content meets the bar.
Expert Commentary and Next Steps
Prompt engineering is not a nice-to-have skill. It is becoming as fundamental as knowing how to search effectively was in the 2000s. The content creators who master it now will have a significant advantage over those who treat AI as a novelty or refuse to learn the craft.
That is not hype. It is arithmetic. If you can produce comparable quality content in half the time, you can either publish more or spend the saved time on strategy, promotion, and the work that compounds. Either path beats the alternative.
"The future belongs to those who can direct AI effectively. Not because AI replaces human creativity, but because it amplifies it. The craft has shifted from word production to word curation."
The framework is here. The templates are here. The troubleshooting guide is here. What remains is practice.
Want AI to Handle the Heavy Lifting?
AgenticWP builds these prompting principles directly into your WordPress workflow. No template hunting. No prompt engineering required. Just describe what you want and let the AI handle the rest.